Risk factors and prognostic value of anastomotic leak in gastric cancer patients undergoing total gastrectomy / 中华普通外科杂志

Objective To analyze the risk factors for anastomotic leak after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients and its impact on patients survival.Methods A total of 1 547 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection between 1999 to 2016 were enrolled.Results The anastomotic leak occurred in 106 of 1 547 patients;and it was happened at a median of (6.0 ± 2.1) day after surgery.The median postoperative hospital stay was (9 ± 3) days for non-anastomotic leak,lower than patients for anastomotic leak with (15 ± 5) days.The anastomotic leak was significantly correlated with age,lung function,BMI,serum albumin,intraoperative blood loss,operative time,smoking and diabetes (P ＜0.05).Multivariable analysis showed that the anastomotic leak was significantly correlated with diabetes,lung function,smoking (P ＜ 0.05).The 30-day mortality with anastomotic leak was lower than patients without leak.The 3'-and 5-year survival rate of patients with anastomotic leak were 53.9％ and 47.7％,significantly lower than those of 69.4％ and 58.5％ without anastomotic leak (P ＜ 0.05).By univariate analysis that BMI,pathological stage,tumor size,serum albumin,anastomotic leak were factors affecting prognosis (P ＜ 0.05).While multivariate analysis showed that anastomotic leakage was independently associated with worse overall survival.Conclusion Anastomotic leakage in patients who underwent total gastrectomy increases the 30-day mortality and associated with poorer 5-year survival.

Analysis of risk factors and prognosis of No.8p lymph node metastasis in cases with advanced gastric cancer / 中华胃肠外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the risk factors and prognosis of No.8p lymph node metastasis in cases with advanced gastric cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Clinicopathological and follow-up data of 790 cases with advanced gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy (including No.8p lymphadenectomy) from October 2003 to October 2013 in Fujian Provincial Tumor Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Associations of No.8p lymph node metastasis with clinicopathological characteristics and metastasis in other regional lymph node were analyzed. Prognostic difference between positive No.8p group and negative No.8p group was examined.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Positive No.8p lymph node was found in 93 cases (11.8%) among 790 cases with advanced gastric cancer. Univariate analysis showed that gender [male 9.8%(56/572) vs. female 17.0%(37/218), P=0.005], preoperative CEA level [<5 μg/L 28.0%(61/218) vs. ≥5 μg/L 5.6%(32/572), P=0.005], tumor size[diameter <5 cm 3.8%(13/346) vs. ≥5 cm 18.0%(80/445), P=0.000], tumor location [gastric fundus and cardiac 10.7% (26/244) vs. gastric body 13.5% (30/222) vs. gastric antrum 10.1% (31/308) vs. total gastric 37.5%(6/16), P=0.007], Borrmann staging [type II( 1.9%(4/211) vs. type III( 11.6% (54/464) vs. type IIII( 30.4%(35/115), P=0.000], tumor differentiation [high 0/8 vs. moderate 6.7%(25/372) vs. low 16.6%(68/410), P=0.000], T staging [T2 2.4%(4/170) vs. T3 13.1%(35/267) vs. T4 15.3%(54/353), P=0.000], N staging [N0 0 (0/227) vs. N1 2.2%(5/223) vs. N2 15.2%(26/171) vs. N3 36.7%(62/169), P=0.000] were closely associated with the No.8p lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analysis that revealed gender (OR=1.762, 95%CI: 1.020-3.043), tumor size (OR=1.107, 95%CI: 1.020-1.203), N staging (OR=4.093, 95%CI: 2.929-5.718), tumor differentiation (OR=1.782, 95%CI:1.042-3.049), and metastasis in No.8a(OR=5.370, 95%CI: 3.425-8.419), No.3(OR=1.127, 95%CI:1.053-1.206), No.6(OR=1.221,95%CI: 1.028-1.450), No.7(OR=2.149, 95%CI: 1.711-2.699), No,11p(OR=2.085, 95%CI: 1.453-2.994), No.14v(OR=2.604, 95%CI: 1.038-6.532) group lymph nodes were the independent risk factors of No.8p lymph node metastasis. One-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates in positive No.8p group were 85.7%, 47.5% and 22.6%, and those in negative No.8p group were 96.2%, 82.5% and 70.3% respectively, whose differences were significant (χ=109.767, P<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Metastasis in Np.8p lymph nodes is an important factor affecting the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer. In patients with female gender, tumor diameter ≥5 cm, preoperative late N staging, low tumor differentiation or metastasis in No.8a, No.3, No.6, No.7, No.11p, No.14v group lymph nodes, thorough clean rance of No.8p group lymph node should be considered.</p>

Clinicopathologic features and prognosis of gastric cancer in 230 young adults / 中华普通外科杂志

Objective To summarize the clinicopathological characteristics and analyze the prognostic factors of young gastric cancer patients.Methods Data of 1 801 gastric cancer patients (divided into ≤45 years of age group,n =230 cases,and ＞ 45 years old group,n =1 571 cases) undergoing gastrectomy in Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital,from June 1999 to November 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.Results Compared with the elderly patients,those ≤45 years old were more female with higher percentage of signet ring cell carcinoma,M1 and non radical resection while less in the upper stomach area (P ＜ 0.05),but there was no statistical difference in tumor size,depth of invasion,lymph node metastasis,Borrmann type,TNM stage,peripheral nerve involvement,cancer embolus,positive margin.Prognostic analysis showed the difference of 5-years survival rate was not statistically significant between young and elderly patients.But the 5-year survival rate in young patients with signet ring cell carcinoma undergoingt radical gastrectomy was better than that of elderly patients (P =0.047,0.038).Multivariate regression analysis showed that M staging and surgical modality were independent prognostic factors for these ≤ 45 years old patients.Conclusion Although there are special clinicopathological features of gastric cancer in young patients,but the postoperative prognosis is relatively the same as those elderly patients.

Effect of perineural invasion in prognosis of 1 801 patients undergoing radical resection of gastric cancer / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective To investigate the relationship between perineural invasion and clinicopathological factors of gastric cancer or prognosis of patients.Methods The retrospective case-control study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 1 801 patients with gastric cancer who were admitted to the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Fujian Medical University between March 1999 and November 2015 were collected.All the patients received surgery in order to the radical resection of gastric cancer,and total gastrectomy or two-thirds and above of gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection were performed.Patients with preoperative stage Ⅲ of clinical staging underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Patients with T3-T4 of histopathologic stage,T1-T2 of positive lymph nodes and T2N0 of high risk factors (low differentiated tumor,lymphovascular invasion,perineural invasion and age ＜ 50 years) underwent postoperative chemotherapy.Observation indicators:(1) treatment situations;(2)pathological characteristics;(3) follow-up results;(4) prognostic factors.Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed once within 1 month postoperatively,once every 3 months within 2 years postoperatively and once every 6 months from 3 to 5 years postoperatively up to February 2016.Follow-up included inquiry,physical examination,routine blood test,biochemical test,carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA),CA19-9,color Doppler ultrasound or computed tomography (CT) and endoscopy.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as (x)±s and comparison between groups was analyzed using the t test.Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range).Ordinal data was analyzed by the nonparametric test.The univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were done using the COX regression model.The hazard ratio (HR)and 95％ confidence interval (CI) were calculated.The survival curve and survival analysis were respectively drawn and done by the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test.Result (1) Treatment situations:all the 1 801patients underwent traditional open surgery,including 1 570 undergoing radical resection and 231 undergoing palliative surgery.Of 1 801 patients,1 029 received total gastrectomy,540 received distal gastrectomy,201 received extended gastrectomy and 31 received resection of residual stomach.Operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,number of lymph node dissected and duration of hospital stay were (173±40) minutes,(224-±91) mL,30± 13 and (15±9) days,respectively.Of 1 801 patients,79 underwent preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 906 underwent postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.(2) Pathological characteristics:results of pathological examinations of 1 801 patients showed that 509 had positive perineural invasion and 1 292 had negative perineural invasion.Tumors located in the upper region,middle region and lower region of stomach,whole stomach and stump stomach were respectively detected in 173,189,123,12,12 patients with positive perineural invasion and 395,417,428,29,23 patients with negative perineural invasion.Type Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ and Ⅳ of Borrmann type were respectively detected in 13,213,244,39 patients with positive perineural invasion and 92,511,629,60 patients with negative perineural invasion.The good and poor tumor differentiations and tumor diameter ＜5 cm and ≥5 cm were respectively detected in 172,337,244,265 patients with positive perineural invasion and 536,756,833,459 patients with negative perineural invasion.Stage Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ,Ⅳv of histopathologic stage,T1,T2,T3,T4 of invasive depth,NO,N1,N2,N3 of lymph node metastasis and positive and negative lymphovascular invasion were respectively detected in 27,54,346,82,17,24,26,442,77,84,109,239,383,126 patients with positive perineural invasion and 263,283,623,123,188,169,289,646,409,219,312,352,437,855 patients with negative perineural invasion,with statistically significant differences in above indexes between positive and negative perineural invasion patients (X2 =14.142,Z =-2.098,X2 =9.061,41.536,Z=-10.389,-13.824,-8.638,X2 =252.624,P＜ 0.05).(3) Follow-up results:1 629patients were followed up for 1.0-99.0 months,with a median time of 37.3 months.The 5-year overall survival rate was 58.5％.(4) Prognostic factors:results of univariate analysis showed that tumor location,Borrmann type,degree of tumor differentiation,tumor diameter,histopathologic stage,invasive depth,lymph node metastasis,lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion were factors affecting prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (HR=1.209,1.303,1.496,2.303,3.368,2.057,1.812,2.013,1.332,95％ CI:1.123-1.301,1.171-1.449,1.290-1.736,2.001-2.649,3.012-3.767,1.856-2.279,1.694-1.939,1.749-2.317,1.126-1.576,P＜0.05).Resuhs of multivariate analysis showed that tumors located in the upper and middle of stomach,whole stomach and stump stomach,tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm,stage Ⅱ-Ⅳ of histopathologic stage,T2-T4 of invasive depth,N1-N3 of lymph node metastasis,positive lymphovascular invasion and positive perineural invasion were independent risk factors affecting prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (HR =1.087,1.234,2.663,1.174,1.136,1.254,1.272,95％ CI:1.008-1.172,1.063-1.432,2.292-3.095,1.035-1.332,1.044-1.236,1.064-1.501,1.066-1.516,P＜0.05).The 5-year survival rate was 49.1％ in 509 patients with positive perineural invasion and 60.7％ in 1 292 patients with negative perineural invasion,respectively,with a statistically significant difference (X2 =11.270,P＜0.05).The 5-year overall survival rate was 41.1％ in 383patients with positive perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion,77.1％ in 126 patients with positive perineural invasion and negative lymphovascular invasion,49.1％ in 437 patients with negative perineural invasion and positive lymphovascular invasion and 92.1％ in 855 patients with negative perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion,respectively,with a statistically significant difference (X2=244.368,P＜0.05).Conclusion Perineural invasion is a high risk factor affecting prognosis of patients with gastric cancer,and it may be useful in evaluating prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.

The clinical significance of lymphovascular invasion in gastric cancer tissues / 中华普通外科杂志

Objective To analyze the relationship of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and the clinical pathological feature of gastric cancer and impact on the prognosis in gastric cancer patients.Methods The clinical and pathological data of 1 482 gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy were analyzed retrospectively.The relationship between LVI and the prognosis was evaluated.Results LVI was found in 606 patients (40.9％),which was in significant correlations with tumor size,tumour location,Borrmann type,tumor differentiation status,operative method,tumor invasion,lymph node involvement,and TNM stage (P ＜ 0.05).The five-year survival of patients with LVI was significantly shorter than that of the LVI-negative patients (55.0％ vs.73.1％,x2 =45.15,P =0.00).By multivariate analysis,LVI was an independent prognostic factor (HR =1.592,95％ CI:1.329-1.907,P =0.00).Conclusion LVI is au important indicator for poor prognosis of gastric cancer,suggesting a more aggressive postoperative therapies.